Flags Review Committee
The Skills and Experience Flags (henceforth, Flags) were born from reports submitted by the Commission of 125 in 2004 and by the Task Force on Curricular Reform in 2005, marking approximately two decades since the Flags conception. As we are now in the 2024-25 academic year, and with 18 years having passed since the Faculty Council enacted the Flags in 2006, it is an ideal time to engage in a thoughtful review of the impact this program has had on our students and their educational outcomes.
Recent administrative changes offer a timely opportunity to revisit the Flags. Oversight has shifted from the Undergraduate College to the Office of Academic Affairs, providing a natural point for review and assessment. In addition, turnover in the staff involved in Flag’s administration suggests that now may be the right time to evaluate how the courses are being run and how we might refine our approach moving forward.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the world in which our students are preparing to enter has evolved significantly over the past 18 years. The Flags have played a key role in equipping our students with the knowledge needed for success beyond the Forty Acres. As such, it is essential to ensure that the Flags align with the current needs of both our students and the society around them.
Committee Charge
The Flags Review Committee will be tasked with performing a review and analysis of our University’s Flags to ensure they empower our students for success in an ever-changing world. By assessing the impact and relevance of our Flags, the committee will explore innovative approaches to enhance the effectiveness of our general education while preparing students to thrive beyond graduation. Our goal is to align the Flags at UT with the evolving needs of society and to reaffirm our commitment to providing a transformative educational experience for all our students.
Justification for the Composition of the Flags Review Committee
The Flags Review Committee was assembled with intentionality, drawing on the diverse expertise of faculty members who are highly respected for their academic and teaching contributions to UT. The committee’s composition reflects a balanced representation of both academic leadership and instructional excellence, ensuring a comprehensive and informed review of the Flags. Below is an explanation of the reasoning behind the selection of these committee members. While the committee’s composition may still change, the same selection principles will apply to all future committee members.
All members of the committee are full-time faculty members, with most holding tenure or tenure-track positions. This ensures that those involved in the review hold a deep understanding of the academic landscape at UT and are well-positioned to assess the Flags. The faculty members chosen are recognized as leaders within their respective fields, having demonstrated excellence in teaching, research and service.
Half of the committee is comprised of academic deans who are also decorated and highly respected members of the faculty and who play an essential role in preserving the academic integrity of their respective college curricula. Academic deans are responsible for overseeing educational programs and ensuring that the courses within their schools uphold the highest standards of academic excellence. Their responsibilities also include monitoring academic integrity and overseeing student programs of study at their respective colleges. As such, their inclusion in this committee is vital for maintaining a strong link between the committee’s recommendations and the University’s broader academic mission. Their leadership within their colleges, combined with their ability to enforce curriculum standards, makes them key contributors to the committee’s work.
Most other committee members were selected from the list of faculties who have been inducted into the Academy of Distinguished Teachers, a prestigious body that honors and rewards excellence in teaching at UT. Membership in the Academy is a recognition of exceptional teaching and mentorship, as well as a commitment to improving the quality and depth of the undergraduate experience. Members of the Academy serve as a resource for other faculty, mentor new faculty members and advise the president and provost on teaching policies and practices. The inclusion of these faculty members ensures that the committee has a strong focus on instructional quality and student outcomes, as these faculty members are deeply engaged in fostering effective teaching and learning.
The Academy’s mission is aligned with the goals of this review committee, which seeks to ensure that the Flags continue to meet the needs of our students in an ever-changing world. Members of the Academy have a track record of promoting innovative teaching methods and enhancing undergraduate education, making their perspectives vital to this review process.
This balance of faculty members who are also academic deans and faculty members from the Academy of Distinguished Teachers was deliberately chosen to bring together a range of perspectives. Academic deans provide insight into curriculum management and academic integrity, while members of the Academy offer expertise in effective instruction and student engagement. This combination ensures that the committee will take a holistic approach to its review, considering both the structural and pedagogical aspects of the Flags.
My hope is that the committee’s composition reflects a thoughtful mixture of leadership and teaching excellence, which will help guide the review of the Flags and ensure that the recommendations made are grounded in both academic integrity and instructional best practices. The diverse backgrounds and expertise of the committee members position them to carefully assess the impact of the Flags and propose recommendations that will enhance the educational experience of our students.
Flag Review Committee Members
Cassandre Alvarado | Moody College of Communication |
Keffrelyn Brown | College of Education |
Douglas Bruster | College of Liberal Arts |
Michael Drew | College of Natural Sciences |
Marci Gleason | College of Natural Sciences |
Ty Henderson | McCombs School of Business |
Steven Hoelscher | College of Liberal Arts |
Greg Sitz | College of Natural Sciences |
Gerald Speitel | Cockrell School of Engineering |
John Turci-Escobar | College of Fine Arts |
Juan Dominguez (ex-officio) | Office of Academic Affairs |
Arthur Markman (ex-officio) | Office of Academic Affairs |